Section 4 32 33, 7 337 C, 7 337 D and 7 qhi F (iii) Attempt to commit qatil um evidence, ji evidence, which has led to the appreciation of study evidence. In the current situation of punishment under Section 777D, PPC, no reference or opinion of the doctor was recorded on the impression that the injury had spread to the cavity of the body. Instead, the report contained only references to internal and external injuries, the prosecution failed to record anything in black and white so that it could pose any risk of injury or affect the cavity of the injured complainant's trunk body. what happened. With such evidence, the defendant cannot be punished merely on the assumption that the injury site may affect the cavity of the affected trunk, in the absence of any definitive evidence in this regard, pursuant to section 337D. The conviction, under sentence, was not sustainable and the accused was. Exempt from the allegation, the accused was also liable to be punished for the injuries caused by the second part of Section 24 of 24 of the PPC, the medical report of the injured shows that he suffered a fireworks injury. Which has led to the exit as well. And the reason for the skin injury or the screaming of the flesh cannot be said from the injury of the bullet, it must be the detection of the body, which falls under the purview of Section 337F (iii), PPC ut. The bone was shown. Section 337F (III), the primary sentence provided for the PPC, was \ Daman, while the imprisonment sentence was arbitrary while in the case of a firearm injury and in the absence of the accused's previous criminal record, Section 7337F (iii). ), Was found guilty under PPC and the trial is pending under the trial court under section 0002424, PPC.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
