Sections 497 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947) have been recovered from the accused in sections 4 and 23 of the illegal exchange, but they claim to be the employee of a person who has already been extended on bail. The fact is that in the present case, no one, 497, was attracted to the mischief of the CR PC, and that one of the co-accused had already been extended the exemption of bail, only on the principle of consistency the accused person. On the matter of, the defendant was admitted to bail for the purpose of bail, under circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
