Sections 51, 105 and 111 by lease deed owners under law marriages (10 of 1984), Arts 17 and 79 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVI, R7 suit under lease dead license and license improvement The scope of the evidence for the defective titles made was that the plaintiff's dispute was that the disputed house came into his possession through domestic arrangements (the partition) and that the defendant was his tenant. Under section 111 of the Transferred Property Act, 1882, which the plaintiff did not deny, the lease deed was not proved by the evidence, the witness confirming the isolation did not confirm the lease deed execution. And did not confirm the signature of the same claimant. In the matter of proprietary ownership of the plaintiff, the Partition Deed was also unprofessional and the plaintiff failed to prove either inferior and plaintiff to the plaintiff, both parties claiming in the plaintiff's claim and claiming that the plaintiff had filed these documents. There is no evidence that the claimant was not and neither was mentioned in the claimant. The plaintiff failed to prove his ownership request, which never claimed in his petition that the other person owns the suithouse and that he cannot be allowed to protest such a request in a cross statement. Was added to the revenue record as the owner. The disputed house that the defendant had built with the permission of another co-owner would not be a charge taker, but the disputed home licensees who received the status of village ecclesiastical revision were partially allowed to conclude that The defendants should be compensated according to the terms. Improvements regarding disputed housing
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
