Section 2 30b (b) (c) Qatiel Ahmed, appreciating the evidence, filed the right of self-defense of the jurisdiction, under section 161, CRPC, on reducing the accused accused of murdering his son. Has stated in his statement three days after the incident. He did not see the accused firing at his son, nor did the fact that he had been narrated by the story to anyone, was not credible, in which case the complainant had failed to provide any motive. That the accused was indicated to kill his son; and even he failed to produce a single testimony from the inmates of his house to prove that his son / deceased had left home in the company of the accused. , The accused had initially requested his defense and his request was affirmed. The site's plan was not based on any hostile record between the accused and the deceased. The prosecution failed to pursue any motive why the accused had killed the deceased. Failure to produce any witnesses that the victim was last seen was on the way from the complainant's company to the complainant's house, except the statement of the victim's father, who, in turn, did not believe the truth, No evidence was presented by the prosecution in support of this case. Without any doubt, the defendant had failed to prove his case, the accused did so in the exercise of his right to self-defense, but he overruled NATO. Injury to the person injured is provided by Section 230b (b), PPC, Section 2302 (c),
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
