Find a Lawyer

CHIEF EXECUTIVE, PESCO versus QUTAB KHAN

The plaintiff in the Section 115 amendment had successfully proved his case through successful and concrete evidence, and defendant's applicants failed to deny it through any conclusive evidence. The courts below had properly appreciated the records and the evidence available on the verdicts, and the orders were well established, leaving the review request merit. Was removed to the limit

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• ABDUR RASHEED v. ALLAH BAKHSH 2013 YLR 1697
• JAVED MUSTAFA v. Mst. TAHIRA NASREEN 2013 YLR 1703
• SHER REHMAN v. State 2013 MLD 1703
• ROZI KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1706
• Mst. SAKINA BIBI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2013 MLD 1724
• KARAM ELAHI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1727
• ASHRAF INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Resources Control Secret 2013 PTD 1732
• CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR v. Syed ALLO DIN 2013 YLR 1739

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

law websites from Kohat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes