Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE KHAN versus AJ&K GOVERNMENT

Civil Code 1908 Section 35 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Articles 42 and 44 were appointed as Research Officer B17 for the imposition of a civil servant on expenditure, and then when the psychologist Sericolt \ B. 18 took office. When vacated, he applied for promotion to that position, but instead was promoted based on the current charge. The director's letter from the deputy director indicated that the co-public servant had been promoted as an assistant entomologist, as entomologist Sericulture B18, a public servant, faced a false belief regarding the development of a co-public employee. Had to do so, he was suggested to withdraw the writ petition filed against the development of the co-public servant, but he did not do so, the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the public servant. Under the provisions of Section 35A, CPC, before a party, it is imperative to file exemplary compensation charges of Rs. 5,000 as compensation for filing an irrational and ridiculous application. The actions of the parties or others were so terrifying that they had no legal basis for litigation. Or that the High Court had no record of the defense of a particular purpose had an effect on the record that the effect of this letter of deputy could not have influenced the director to file a writ petition to the public servant, especially when he was working papers. Unaware of the contents, the mere fact that the civil servant did not withdraw the writ petition did not justify the preliminary proceedings for participation. registration advocate from Khyber Agency lawyer