Find a Lawyer

ASIF DURRANI versus MALIK SHAHID IQBAL

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Drafting Act 1974 Section 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act (XX5I of 1975), Section 4 was accelerated in civil service, appealed before the Supreme Court of Development Authority, restoring the respondents who were in the appellant. Was younger, was approved for diversion / acceleration before development but the relevant authority refused to accept the department's appeal filed against the respondents according to which the order was dismissed and before the service tribunal. The same was done to appeal to the respondents, no further appeal was filed by the respondents, service The Tribunal's order was received by the Tribunal after the proceedings ordered the development of the defendants and the appellants, who were not parties to the preliminary proceedings, filed before the Supreme Court that the respondents' turn The rights of promotion will be adversely affected. The accuracy respondent was not eligible for a second treatment. When the service tribunal which passed it last July got final status. Appellants have admittedly succeeded as respondents' seniority, it cannot be said that they were not saddened by the order of the Service Tribunal to continuously develop the respondents or this had a detrimental effect on their rights. Hadn't had The Supreme Court, in the circumstances, ordered the respondents to be promoted, to which they were not entitled best law firm from Doaaba lawyer