Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

KH. MUHAMMAD AHSAN versus MANZOOR ALI KHOKHAR


Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1977 R8 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Sections 114 and O XLVII, R1 Sanitary Review Petitioner Applicant was appointed against the relevant post which the High Court Was approved through an approved order of. In the writ petition filed by the applicant, but since his second batch of colleagues had been dismissed by the service tribunal regarding the applicant's sanity, he was not granted the sanity on that day, but the applicant served. No appeal was filed in the Supreme Court against the tribunal's verdict. The claim of sanity from the date when the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) was not in the service of the applicant through R8 of Rules 1977 when the request for review was not rejected.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Kashmir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.