NAEEM FEROZE versus RAJA IQBAL RASHID MINHAS
Rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Appointments and Regulations of Services) 1977 R 3 The SAD (Procedure) of the provision of the R3 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), sections 42 and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Appointment and Terms of Service (Rules, 1977) declared that ad hoc appointments may be made through advertising. After the test and interview of all the applicants who responded to this advertisement; after sending the transfer to the Public Service Commission and including a certificate of appointment order, the case was forwarded to the Public Service Commission. The Government employee was appointed on an ad hoc basis without fulfilling the conditions contained in Section 3 of the Government employees of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rolls, 1977, his appointment was bad in law and the High Court rightly put it aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer