Find a Lawyer

MUNSHI KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SULEMAN

Civil Procedure Code Order XXII's Death, Marriage and Parties Insurance Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XXII, Rr 1 and 2 Suit Defendants Claim the Death of One of the Defendants, Initially Sold to Him The agreement was transferred in favor of the plaintiff, the plot was transferred again in favor of two different transfers, and both vendors made a statement before the State Officer in favor of the final transfer and the transfer process was legal. Was imported. A shopkeeper who has already passed in favor of the last transfer has already confirmed the transfer of the plot in favor of the last transfer, which was in the original possession of the plot. The real transfer has alleged that the plot has been transferred to him. Is gone In the first instance, the two subsequent conversions should be void against his rights. A transfer of the plot in favor of the final transfer that died during the trial was filed through a final transfer petition, since the deceased defendant's legal representatives were not on record after his death within a fixed period. Was brought, in this case it can be claimed that he was a convicted defendant. Having relinquished all his legal rights in the plot in favor of the applicant / final transfer, after the death of the defendant, the final transfer would be considered to represent the interest of the deceased in respect of the plot as favoring the final transfer. Due to the transfer, the plot did not inherit the deceased defendant's legal heritage, so the question of bringing the deceased defendant's records to the legal representatives would not arise and he did not ask for a case for filing a petition. advocate for immigration from Peshawar lawyer