HAJI TUFAIL MUHAMMAD versus ASSISTANT ENGINEER NO.1, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS,D.S. OFFICE, LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections (3) (A) and 22A (8) (G) alleging unfair labor by the resigning employee alleging that the employer requested premature retirement because of his trade union activities Had obtained the thumb mark on. The employer obtained his resignation by cheating on him, which was equivalent to unfair labor by the employer. The employee could not prove that his resignation was obtained by playing fraud with him while the employer was fully satisfied. Proved that the employee voluntarily resigned or was not applicable by the employee because he was working on special rail lines related to the Defense Services Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, not applicable to the employee's case. Due to this, their request was bound to be rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Sita Road lawyer
