Section 54 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 172 illegal occupation department Revenue officers, the performance of duties, the present finding of facts by the courts under the plaintiff claimed that it had sued the land Demanded possession of land and forbade entry against landowners. In order to prevent those responsible for their land and duties from performing their legitimate duties, the two courts, respectively, reversed the trial and the appeal filed by the Revenue Officer regarding the accuracy of the plaintiffs, carrying out their legal responsibility. Could not be barred and the case filed by the plaintiff was subjected to the provisions of section 172 of West Pakistan Land. By the abolition of Section 144 of the Revenue Act, 1967 and Section 28 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the infringement or offense could not be claimed on the basis of unlawful possession and the case filed by the plaintiff was not valid and the appeal was dismissed as a lower appellate court. Could do Do not seek a declaration against the defendants because the tax records confirm that the fact that they were in their possession and the joint owners were, therefore, they requested the qualified Revenue Officer to give the ceiling owner a permanent As such, the premises cannot be prevented from entering the property in which there is no interference with it, nor is there any proof or fault in reading it. The decisions and orders presented by the two courts below were found on the proper scrutiny of the material on the record, therefore, it refused to intervene because there was no illegal, corrupt, irregularity or instability in the decisions and Look
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
