The case for the specific performance of the Section 12 suit agreement was a false contract court fee, the defendant's ex-sister's ex-wife being the plaintiff's ex-wife, and the marriage was dissolved on the basis of the Khulla plaintiff's claim that his ex-wife as 225,000 Kholla and the defendants are guaranteed to pay Rs. The trial court dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff but the lower appellate court allowed the appeal and affirmed the case in favor of the plaintiff. The lower appellate court failed to take into account the nature of the claim, which was not legal, a question arising when the lower appellate court for marriage did not overlook the earlier decision of the court under which the spouse was present. The appellate court had already imposed a wrong law by entertaining an appeal without a court fee without applying for a marriage bond under section 148/149. , CPC did not share petitioner for court fee hike URT fee did not raise such point of court fee before the High Court at the time of filing a civil review before the High Court. Nor did the office take notice when the application was submitted, however, the party could not escape its legal obligation and could not refrain from paying it. Court Fees The Memorandum of Defendants' Request was Obligated to Receive Court Fees, therefore, the High Court directed the Collector to collect Judicial Fees from the Defendants as well as to collect Judicial Fees from the Plaintiff's High Court and to the Lower Appellate Court. Restored judgment and order passed by. The trial court was allowed to amend the circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
