Find a Lawyer

MUSA KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of the Narcotic Substances Steel Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (c) Guarantee, Assessment of Drugs Seizure. The co-accused further investigation was not recovered from the suspect's possession / car but it was alleged that the accused, allegedly recovered from the car by the co-accused, was detaining the co-accused in drug trafficking. Was assisted, it had not yet been decided by the prosecution whether the accused was detaining the accompanying accused. The accused had been behind bars since the date of his arrest, and his further detention in prison would not be for the purpose allowed under the bail conditions.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013

• Molvi MUHAMMAD SARWAR v. RETURNING OFFICER PB-15, MUSA KHAIL 2013 CLC 1583
• TARIQ HUSSAIN v. SARFARAZ AHMED 2013 CLC 1620
• ABDUL QADIR v. BABI SABIRA 2013 CLC 1749
• MUHAMMAD ARIF v. YAR MUHAMMAD 2013 CLC 1757
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. BIBI SAHIKIRA 2013 CLC 1808
• Malik MEHBOOB v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 2013 CLC 1865
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. SECRETARY FOREST through Executive Officer, Lasbella at Uthal 2013 CLC 1902
• RAHIM BAKHSH ABRO v. SHAHNAZ PARVEEN 2013 YLR 2006

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2013 →

top advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes