MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus SECRETARY FOREST THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER, LASBELLA AT UTHAL
Investigations by two courts under the Forest Department for investigating the case under Articles 42 and 54 of 54 have claimed to be the owner of the suit land and have alleged that the defendants have cut down the tree and constructed the building illegally. The trial court and the lower appellate court have also been declared. Together, the claims and appeals were decided in favor of the Forest Department. Both the decisions passed by the two courts under the High Court's interference guarantee did not find anything illegal or irregular, in which the same defendants failed to reject the Forestry claim in which The earth exists. The dispute was not allotted or the provincial government was not the owner of the same owner The following was on the record of reconciliation of facts presented by the two courts which could not be bothered by the High Court generally. Until it can be proved that the matter was shocking, funny or artificial. The defendants failed to explain any part of the evidence that was misread, unread or misused, and after the two courts had properly examined the evidence and material available on the record, the following are merely general grounds. And after attending every aspect of the case, the High Court could not find any false news or non-reading. The conclusions passed by two courts below the evidence and the amendment were refused to interfere, they were dismissed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
