Find a Lawyer

RAHIM BAKHSH ABRO versus SHAHNAZ PARVEEN

Section 13 Withdrawal Request The tenant claims ownership of the disputed property The evidence of the landlord has established a relationship between the parties as the landlord and the tenant have allowed the eviction request and the tenant vacates the property. Where the claim of ownership was not proved by the tenant. Then, it would automatically result in him being directed to vacate the property because of poor payroll, because he refused to pay the monthly rent and, moreover, the owner to lose his property. Was tried, the appeal was dismissed

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013

• MUSA KHAN v. State 2013 MLD 1774
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. BIBI SAHIKIRA 2013 CLC 1808
• Malik MEHBOOB v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 2013 CLC 1865
• MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. SECRETARY FOREST through Executive Officer, Lasbella at Uthal 2013 CLC 1902
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, FEDERAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX CUSTOMS HOUSE, QUETTA v. MUHAMMAD USMAN 2013 PTD 2116
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX v. ABDUL RASHID 2013 PTD 2217
• MOULA BAKHSH v. State 2013 YLR 2407
• NASIR ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary Board of Revenue 2013 YLR 2500

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2013 →

online advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes