MOLVI MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus RETURNING OFFICER PB-15, MUSA KHAIL
Arts, 63, 62? and 199 ation for the Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976), SS 99, 14 and 12 Constitution of Pakistan Officer, however, the Election Tribunal ordered that the said papers be rejected on the basis that the applicant. Had contested the last election on the basis of fake / fake degree and had turned public funds for his personal use as a minister. During the last election, they relied on the Sanda, which they said was equivalent to a bachelor's degree, and it was not equated to a bachelor's degree by the Supreme Court, with respondents citing applicants. Cited government correspondence from The Minister) uses scholarships to fund his own children's education, and such correspondence was not logically or seriously rejected. Good character in view of such conduct by the petitioner, who concluded to the High Court that this correspondence was made and that the applicant was provided for personal use by the Public Investigator. Or no one can be told. Did not violate Islamic requirements or was honest and honest or under Article 62 of the Constitution and Section 99 of the Public Representation Act 1976 prohibits such person from being elected or elected to Parliament. Needs The laws of the place in which he lived and did not allow the infringement of the rights of others and put himself forward as a candidate, when he did not qualify, he followed the laws and rights of those who obeyed the law. Violated. It was also violated because a
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2013
