Risk of Term Deposits by Section 24 (2) Pre-Importer Prior to this, the Emperor challenged the sale price of the suit property mentioned in the Sale Deed / Succession, in which it was claimed that in this case The trial court has determined the probable value of the suit property. The purpose of submitting the value fixed by the trial court to the trial court, which sought the return of the matter to the trial court, to determine the probable value of the suit property and the High Court of Appeal. The revision court ruled and the trial court's re-hearing was used by the trial court at its discretion to determine the probable value of the property. The trial court was wrong and the reviewing court rightly remanded the case; after the High Court order, the trial court's order was resurrected, meaning it appeared and became operative at the same time. , The profession should have deposited Zar-e-Seum within the remaining days, which was left over from the legal period of 30 days even if there were no days left and nothing. Mistake by the pre-emptor, he could have deposited the Spit Emperor the next day, enraged by the High Court order, should have deposited the gold deposit as per the trial court's approval and its approval. The court and then it should have approached the Supreme Court to suspend the order to protect itself from the consequences of Section 24 (2) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, in the case of a favorable decision by the Supreme Court, Receive or pay for any surplus paid by it
