Section 42 of the Pakistan42 Constitution Constitution of Pakistan, Article I (185 ()) filed a lawsuit against the plaintiffs / respondents against the defendants / applicants claiming that the disputed property was actually a A person was allotted to S to which the land of death was changed. The favor of his widow and daughter in equity shares through limited property. The widow of \ S of whom remarried, a daughter (the forerunner of the defendant) was born, and that after the death of the widow of S ow, the limited estate ended and the plaintiff inherited the disputed land. I found that the trial court ruled in this case that the defendants were dismissed in favor of the plaintiffs, respectively, on appeal and revision filed before the Appellate Court and the High Court, which claimed that The disputed land was never allotted to \ S \ but his widow was allotted, who owned it. All the land on the commissioner's instruction, and that after his death, his daughter (the defendant's predecessor) inherited the land. Collector S's daughter (the defendant's predecessor) filed an appeal before the collector. K, who was allowed and her case remanded during post-remand proceedings, told the Assistant Commissioner that \ S of is a widow. It was recommended to nominate the original tenant and his daughter (the defendant's predecessor), against which the decision was appealed before the Collector, who decided that all S was the original allottee against which the Collector. The order was dismissed by the Commissioner. Collectors and commissioners have never been challenged, so