MUHAMMAD LAIQ KHAN versus HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD.
Keeping the request for a worker's complaint of section 2 (xxviii) and 25 of labor, the court withheld the complaint filed by the employer against the dismissal of his service as a charge of the relevant department only on the basis of the dismissal letter. In which the employee was shown as a supervisor / charge. No further documentary evidence was presented by the employer, which provided proof of his claim that the letter of appointment and the roster of duties which were the basic documents were not submitted by the employer through the Labor Court under which the complaint was made. The petition was dismissed as a supervisor / charge to the employees, and the Labor Appellate Tribunal rejected the Labor Court order that did not affect the trust, demanding a re-decision on the matter, which prompted the employer to file two documents. Asked to present.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from FR DI Khan lawyer
