Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BISCUIT FACTORY versus NAEEM AHMED

Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 Sections 8 and 30 fatal wounds were paid by employees for a work-related crime factory when a packing machine operator was employed during an accident and two fingers were cut off as a result of the accident. Two fingers and thumb were damaged. Filed an application under section 8 (i) of the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923. They alleged a loss of earning capacity of 60% and claimed Rs 60,000 as compensation as provided in the schedule, the employer opposed, but did not file, the employee's claim in his written statement. Neither the affidavit nor the evidence was presented in the evidence, and finally the employer was stopped and after hearing of the commissioner's compensation, the parties awarded workers compensation up to Rs 50,000 while their liability. Due to injuries sustained during the period, the employer was of the view that when he deposited his part in the Social Security Institution on behalf of the employees. The tuition, said that the institute is responsible for paying employees compensation or repaying the employer's costs for dealing with the employee, because the employer was prevented from doing so. By participating in the Security Fund, employees could be admitted to the Social Security Institution, which is under their control. But the employer has not done so, according to the schedule of the Workers' Compensation Act, 1923, which cannot interfere with the workers' compensation order for workers' compensation. best advocate from Pishin lawyer