Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAREEF versus FAUJI FERTILIZER COMPANY, RAWALPINDI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Complaints Demand for Cross-examination Closing Amendment Jurisdiction, Appellate Tribunal Respondents / Employers filed an affidavit in evidence of their two witnesses and interrogated the aforesaid witness. The action for has been postponed. Applicant / Employee Matter was periodically postponed on request of applicant / employee because his lawyer remained absent and after almost thirteen postponements the applicant / employee failed to inspect the witnesses' testimony. After the applicant / employee or his lawyer failed to appear at the closing date of the hearing, the employee's employer's right to examine the witnesses was terminated by the Labor Court and Section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, The main application filed under 1969 was settled by the employee for final arguments, closing the Labor Court's order of accuracy. The employee shall examine the employer's testimony that does not suffer from any illegal activity or misconduct that cannot be interfered with by the Labor Appellate Tribunal under its jurisdiction to review, The application was already dealt with under 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. law firms from Sukkur lawyer