Find a Lawyer

BLUE RIBBON BAKERS versus FAROOQ AHMED

The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 (2) (A) (B) and 38 (3A) record the request for complaint, and the request for review of the witnesses' production is requested by the employee On filing a complaint against the suspension of employment, the employer filed a written statement and the matter was settled for evidence of the parties. The employee filed an affidavit in the evidence and was cross-examined by the employer. The affidavit was entered into the evidence and the matter was fixed for its cross examination. The employee, the employee, filed the petition under section 36 (2) (a) (b), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The petitioner filed an order under the order to apply for visas and some evidence to be presented to the Labor Court and ordered the notice to be issued. The Labor Court should have done the cross-examination of the employer to justify the employer and said It was said that if the Labor Court found that the cross-examination was over. In any case, he may call for witnesses or ask for evidence. Except for the central case, the original case was against the policy of labor laws, which required that the complaints be addressed within seven days under the Section 25A Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The labor court order provided in S25 was set by the Labor Appellate Tribunal under the amended jurisdiction in which the Labor Court was instructed to record an employer's cross-examination and to examine another witness. top advocate from Mehrab Pur lawyer