MUHAMMAD JUMMA versus FORBES FORBES CAMPBELL (PVT.) LIMITED
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), Section 2 (II), 15 and 17 overtime payments of employment claiming that he has been working for twelve years a day for almost two years. He performed his duty for hours, but he said overtime that under the Payment of Wages Act, the authority did not pay for four hours. But in an appeal filed by the employer, the Labor Court ruled that the place where the employee worked did not fall under the jurisdiction. Evidence on the industry record record that the employee acted as a watchman, was a commercial entity under the West Pakistan Shops and Establishment Ordinance, the Wages Act, 1969, the employee deserving of it. Was not entitled Overtime claim cannot interfere with review of labor order by the Labor Appellate Tribunal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Shangla lawyer