SH. RIAZ-UL-HAQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF LAW
Section 3 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 3 Balochistan Service Tribunals Act (V 1974), Section 3 KP Services Tribunals Act (I of 1974), Section 3 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 3 Chairman and Members Service Rules of the Federal Service Tribunal, 1983, R1 Service Tribunals (Qualifications of Members) Rules, 1974, R2 Constitution Pakistan, Arts 212 (1) (a), 175, 2A, 9 and 184 (3). Although Article 184 (3) of the Constitution provides for the chairman and members to consult on the procedure of the Federal and Provincial Service Tribunals in relation to the jurisdiction of the High Court jurisdiction in relation to the Chief Justice of Pakistan / Chief Justice. Noon and Rules (Service) Tribunals have not provided any facility for consultation with the respective Chief Justice, but since the (Service) Tribunals are established under Article 1212 of the Constitution, consideration of Article 15 (3) of the Constitution. As regards the appointment of the members of the Chairman / Members (Service) Tribunals, the relief provision had to be followed when matters relating to the appointment of the members and members of the service tribunals were as important as the judiciary. Appointments happen. If an officer or chairman / member of a tribunal performing judicial duties is consulted, it is necessary to consult the relevant chief justice, in order to free the chairman and members of the service tribunals, their appointments must be made in meaningful consultation. For the purpose of the Chief Justice, the Federal Service Tribunal, all appointments made without a consultation with the Chief Justice of the respective High Court for the Chief Justice of Pakistan and the Provincial Service Tribunals were void where a retired High Court Judge was to be. Was appointed (chairman) of the tribunal
