Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus HAJI MUHAMMAD BARAN KHAN

Section 12 Evidence of Oral Contract for Sale of Real Estate for Specific Performance Plaintiff Cases Specific Performance of Oral Contract for Sale of Real Estate, The Trial Court Rejects the Case of the Plaintiff's High Court The Plaintiff contends that the Plaintiff has neither mentioned the date of the bargaining nor in the presence of the witnesses whose oral contract was not mentioned in the sale. The period was not fixed and such fact was not mentioned in the names of the plaintiffs. The alleged witnesses of the oral agreement were not involved in contradictory material contained in the statements of the defendant's witness and the alleged witness of the oral agreement was based on the evidence of the statement of a serious witness that the plaintiff failed to produce any document. In pursuance of agriculture it was conveyed that the plaintiff's sale had failed to prove the oral agreement between the parties and the payment of the money at the time of the oral agreement had to be proved by reliable and irrefutable evidence, but the present case. The plaintiff I failed to do was materially illegal or irregular In which the undesired decision of the High Court of Appeal was dismissed accordingly.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2013

• ABDUL RASHID alias TEDDI v. State 2013 SCMR 1281
• AHMED KHAN DEHPAL v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN 2013 PLC(CS) 1281
• MIR AJAB KHAN v. DEPUTY POSTMASTER-GENERAL, SRP, DERA ISMAIL KHAN 2013 PLC(CS) 1294
• Miss KALSUM KHALIQ, ADVOCATE, ISLAMABAD v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2013 SCMR 1295
• Sh. RIAZ-UL-HAQ v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Law 2013 PLC(CS) 1308
• KHALID PERVAIZ GILL v. SAIFULLAH GILL 2013 SCMR 1310
• HAMID MAHMOOD v. State 2013 SCMR 1314
• HASEEBA TAIMOR AFRIDI v. State 2013 SCMR 1326

All Supreme Court judgments of 2013 →

solicitors from Chicha watni lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes