Grant of arrest and detention of female accused confessed that until now she had been involved / detained despite the absence of contradictory evidence against the Sections 497 and 167 advertisement, legal evidence. Evidentiary evidence against the accused was not collected to justify when no relevant evidence was available. Then the question was why did the police cause the arrest of the accused, who was said to be 15 years old, even though the accused was subjected to interrogation, no evidence was brought to the record but he was still brought to judicial lock. Sent to the Supervisory Officer, he was responsible for overseeing subordinate officers' investigations, the same was the magistrate responsible for remand, instead of sending the accused to police remand without justification. Should be considered, the defendant was allowed interim bail in the circumstances along with the instructions which should be clarified. Concerned police officers should seek state reasons for the arrest and detention of the accused, and their respective magistrates should also send their explanation through the session judge, in order to clarify that, in a mechanical way, on the relevant provisions of the law. Why not remand the police remand only after a court remand?
