AGHA INAM-UR-REHMAN KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 5 (a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 105 and 192 Order of dismissal of civil judge banned on appeal before the Governor legally employs civil judge (appellant) Dismissed by the competent authority / High Court Chief Justice, ordering 9,000 dates, it is stated that on August 23, 2000, the Code Order reached a civil judge in Koswal, and he appealed before the Chief Justice of the High Court. Filed, whose appeal has been reversed. In order to make a proper presentation before the jurisdictional forum in this case, the civil judge then presented a motion before the governor, which remained uncontested, and after a period of three months, he made a provision in section 5 (a). On 19 7, 2000 a new appeal was filed before the Tribunal. The appeal of the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act, 1991 was dismissed because the Civil Judge was barred from time to time under the RVants Act, 1974 under Section 21 (2) of the Punjab Civil C. Treatment was usable before the next authority's dismissal authority. That the Governor of the province had the authority over the Chief Justice of the High Court, who approved the dismissal order, therefore, a proper and appropriate request for representation was made before the Governor, which was not decided in 90 days. He was forced to take advantage. His (latest) right to appeal, which was periodically filed by the High Court Chief Justice in his capacity, was granted by the competent authority on 3 3, 2000, and therefore, he (the Chief Justice) was heard. Was not an option The appeal was filed before the Chief Justice of the High Court and neither has the jurisdiction of the Assembly
