Section 2 30b (b) Qatil Ahmed, on the offer of the testimony of Ali al-Shiq, was charged with the presence of the accused on the occasion of the incident that he had fired on the deceased, resulting in the death of the latter. On which the High Court dismissed the appeal. Police charged themselves with the scout unit's commanding officer's letter with a letter from the Scouts Unit commanding that the accused, on the day of the incident, have surrendered himself, according to section 2302 (b), to the accused against his conviction and punishment. Was on duty in a different city. The statements of five persons belonging to the Scouts unit of the accused were also mentioned, mentioning the fact that the accused was on duty in a different city on the day of the incident, the accused took to the police officers as soon as possible on the spot. Emphasized Alibi's request and also in his statement under Section 342, the CCPC before the trial court's document was presented in evidence to prove Alibi's plea taken by the accused. Can be done. Again, the prosecution was referred for dismissing such a document, which was not available in the presence of doubt about the presence of the accused at the time of the incident, which had the benefit of going to him, the appeal. Granted, the unclean decision of the higher court was set aside and the accused acquitted of the charge \ r \ n
