C. N. RAMAPPA GOWDA versus C.C. CHANDREGOWDA (DEAD)
A. VIII, R10 Plaintiff has failed to file a written statement in favor of the plaintiff, relying on the facts in the plaintiff's case, the legal plaintiff court must require the plaintiff to make such statement Prove the facts stated in the case. The defendants (the defendants) of the property failed to file written statements, and the trial court directed the plaintiff to present the evidence to the plaintiff with some of the documents filed by the plaintiff through the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not go to trial and on the basis of his pleas and prior evidence, the High Court adjourned the order remanding the case to the trial court for re-hearing and the written statements to the defendants. Allowed to enter and submit documents The sole affidavit was joint family property he had filed and failed to guide any oral or documentary evidence to prove that the property was joint in nature even if the plaintiff's case was valid, at the time of trial. It was important for the trial court to direct him to some documentary evidence for the trial. It is credible that the attempt to distribute the property was common, but it appears that the trial court relied solely on the plaintiff's case, relying on his affidavit saying that Reliance made the statement. Was blindfolded on an oath. The trial court merely sued the suit on the ground that the defendants had failed to file written statements.
