Attack or criminalization of Section 103 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 353/109/186 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) / 16/20 Force to pay public servants their duties, ridicule, disrupt public servants from performing their duties, acts of terrorism, possessing illegal weapons, deliberately procuring weapons, etc. from unlicensed persons, police and Frontier Constabulary. Prevent export of weapons, ammunition from a joint team consisting of And the Vehicles Frontier Constabulary kept the said articles and provided the police with only a list of them as the preparation of the articles presented in the court case was not allowed by the Property Scope Trial Court to present the weapons, ammunition and vehicles. Which is why the record exists. Do not disclose the fact that the police authorities have taken the subjects into custody. Even if a seizure memo was created on the site. Whether the recovered articles have been declared a case property, and whether the requirements of Section 103, CRPC were allowed by the High Court to submit a prosecution, on the basis of the restored articles it has been stated that the FIR Has indicated itself that the articles were physically seized by the Frontier Constabulary and that only one list was handed over to the police, and since the question of the application of section 103, the CCP's decision was pending with the trial court. Will be legalized FIR has revealed that joint team (consisting of Frontier Constabulary and police) stopped the convoy The arms and ammunition were recovered, and the Frontier Constabulary
