MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN versus MUHAMMAD LQBAL KHAN
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 11, O II, R 2, O IX, R 9 and O XXIII, R 1 The nomination filed by the prosecutor for the purpose of filing a new case without the permission of the judicial competitor had initially filed two cases. And one was dismissed by the plaintiff on the charge of litigation and the other was withdrawn by the plaintiff without permission to file a case before the court-issued suit finalized. , Because the application was dismissed, an appeal or review is pending or the lawsuit was subsequently filed by the plaintiff. At the time of withdrawal of the previous case, permission to hear a new trial from the court cannot be filed by the plaintiff in any case because the plaintiff was barred from filing a fresh case against the same party. In addition to the restriction in the latter case, IX, R9, O II, R2 and O XXIII, RI, CPC will also face the opinion of Race Judista under Section H, Explon IV, CPC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Head Marala lawyer