Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAZIL NADEEM versus SAID HUSSAIN

Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975, the appeal of Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974) to the respondents of the Supreme Court, who are the Administrative Officers and BPS Session 16 in BPS 16, respectively. I was appointed as a manager, was appointed. Assistant administrators and their development at BPS 17 were confirmed on the recommendation of the Selection Board Appellant, who was also appointed Manager at BPS 16, for consideration for the promotion, but the selection board was also appointed by the Appellant. The source was not challenged by the appellant before the service tribunal, but the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed with good faith and was timely barred. Once the appeal against the development of the respondents filed on the recommendation of the Selection Board is dismissed, the regular promotion of the final successor respondents cannot be challenged. In an appeal before the Supreme Court, the dispute between the parties was already bee n resolved by the service tribunal. how to become a advocate from Daud Khel lawyer