Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMAD KAYAM versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Section 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 and 22 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), a section 42 compulsory retirement review civil servant, were posted as assistant engineers, but they must Was retired After taking disciplinary action against some serious allegations against it, the request of the Government employees to review the petition filed against the mandatory retirement order which has not been decided by the Authority / Prime Minister within a 90-day legal period. Was filed, the government employee, pending review petition, filed before the service tribunal and after the said appeal was rejected, the government employees filed an appeal against the decision of the service tribunal, whose appeal was so dismissed. After the adjournment before the authority / prime minister was adjourned after which the PM Ordered the redeployment of employment of public servants. Related Authorities Refuse Implementation: Prime Minister's Order, Government Employees Apply For A writ of mandamus in the High Court for the implementation of the Prime Minister's Order, but the petition was dismissed by the High Court on the basis of which I had already approved the review request filed by government employees. The Service Tribunal and the then Supreme Court High Court also observed that the Prime Minister had no jurisdiction in the matter after the appeal was dismissed by the Service Tribunal and subsequently by the Supreme Court, when the review filed by public servants. The application was not decided by the authority within the legal period. In 90 days and a civil servant made head ask a advocate free from Karore Lalisan lawyer