Find a Lawyer

BILAL AHMAD versus ASMAT HUSSAIN SHAH

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission Regulatory Rules 1994 R5 Allotted respondents for Muzaffarabad District under the quota system that forms part of the Appellate Admission Policy in Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 43 Supreme Court. In his constitutional petition, the appellant challenged the High Court that the Public Service Commission had failed to give the defendant an additional number which he deserved on the basis of the sports certificate. The High Court accepted the respondent's request and the appellant. Declaring the appointment illegal and keeping appellant's appointment aside, the lack of public service Shin was instructed to issue recommendations in favor of the defendant and inform the defendant's appointment, no clause was found in relation to giving additional numbers on the basis of sports certificate. Candidates inviting applications for admissions published by the Advertising Public Service Commission were filed by the candidates, but neither on the last date of submission of the application nor on the dates when the written examination of the candidates was taken or interviewed. Taken, there was a policy of giving extra numbers based on sports certificates. Made, but said that the decision was taken by the Public Service Commission only three days before the appointment of candidates who were tested and interviewed where the post was advertised, the candidates had the right to be considered as qualified. That the advertisement was given and if the rules and qualifications were amended or changed by the authority after sending a request to the Public Service Commission, the said amended or changed rules will not apply to those positions for which the Public Service Give the commission power of attorney advocate Gilgit lawyer