Find a Lawyer

TAHIR-UN-NISSA versus IMRANA RAFEE

Appeal of a Government Employee to the Appellant of the Supreme Court, who served as Assistant Professor in Sections 4 and 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 and Section 42BL of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (1974 VII). Moved to another place to work as a transfer lecturer, a post containing B17 and the respondent who was recently assigned as lecturer HB17, was moved to the transfer site. , It was stated that upon filing an appeal against the transfer order, the service tribunal granted interim stay for the appellant, but was subsequently misunderstood. On the ground that the transfer had already joined the transfer premises that the appellant's pending injunction had become an irrelevant matter before the service tribunal, the appellant filed leave for appeal before the court, and the appellant. The appeal of the petitioner was filed for hearing. The transfer order transferred by the authority and challenged before the service tribunal was not an easy order of transfer, but it was an order by which the Assistant Professor in Appellant / Citizen B18. The servant who served as BK was dismissed as lecturer at B17, which was clearly But the illegal case was appropriate in which the process of a transfer order which was challenged by the appellant government employee could be suspended until the service tribunal appeal was dismissed. By the Service Tribunal Order of Service Tribunal under which the pre-approved interim order was invalid, the service was set aside before the Tribunal pending the settlement of the appeal. female advocates from Shamsabad lawyer