AFTAB AHMED. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HEADQUARTER, MUZAFFARABAD versus KHURSHID HUSSAIN, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Section 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974 Appellant of the Appellate Supreme Court, who was in the post of Assistant Sub Inspector Police, was promoted to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police, who served. I was younger than the appellant. The promotion of the Deputy Superintendent was also promoted after the promotion of the Appellant Order, which clearly showed that the defendant's promotion would only give him specific benefits and that he would stand as a junior from the Appellant. Was developed in a manner which was not challenged by the defendants. Became the final respondent to receive the amendment notification, whereby the respondent was promoted to the position of Deputy Superintendent of Police, who was badly affected by such modification, he represented the defendant. Had been filed by the government and the order was challenged by the government. The Deputy Tribunal and the Service Tribunal accepted the appeal by the respondent before and did not approve the government-approved qualification, but on the basis that the representation made by the appellant before the time-limit was imposed by the Government. It was proved that the representation filed by the appellant before the Government was not time bound, but over time the Order of Service Tribunal was challenged by the appellant, before the Supreme Court Service Tribunal filed the case. Did not comment on the merits and rejected the technical representation of the delay, which A misunderstanding ensued, the Supreme Court handed the case over to the service tribunal. Law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
