RANGEEL AHMED BUTT versus ZOONI
Issuance of summons to the trial court for the complaint filed under Section 302/109/34, PPC after recording the preliminary evidence of section 204 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 302 / 10.9 / 34 warrant case The summons was issued against the accused, the complainant's objection was that neither the crime caused by the accused's warrant case nor the case of the summons, the trial court should have issued the warrant against the accused and not the summons. Was released, and the accused, who was illegally summoned, was released on bail by the subordinate courts. Under the provisions of section 204, the CCP had the affirmation to issue a warrant or summons in which the scope of the warrant case fell and was said to be arbitrary. Especially when it was not shown that it is crooked or used against it. On any principle of legal principle, the release of the accused on bail can only be challenged through proper complaint and at the appropriate stage, which cannot interfere with the intellect. In the current action
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Digri lawyer