Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN versus ZAHID HUSSAIN CHAUDHRY

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Contempt of Court Act 1993 Section 4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978, O VII, R 10 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIIth of 1974), Section 42A (4) Applicant of contempt of court / any The complainant, acting as the deputy general manager of the bank, submitted his resignation, which was accepted with immediate effect, after which, the applicant was issued a show cause notice, with a maximum of 14 charges against him. Were made and it is stated that the applicant was such. Under its constitutional jurisdiction, the first person to violate 21 (i) to (iii) of the Bank High Court Staff Service Rules stated that with this cause notice it was stated that it was without legal authority. And the High Court judgment has been upheld. Later, through the Supreme Court, the defendant / plaintiff, who was the senior auditor of the bank, issued a letter to the applicant in which the applicant was ordered to deposit some amount on the basis of the goods contained in the letter. The comparison of the showcase notice of the seven days before that was rejected by the Supreme Court and then the letter issued by the respondent to the applicant shows that the items mentioned in the letter were the same as those on the basis of the showcase notice in the previous proceedings. The respondent had neither withdrawn the notice from the applicant nor did he apologize for the disqualification. Respondents acted contrary to the clear conclusions given by the Supreme Court in their first decision and, thus, sought to diminish the authority and dignity of the Supreme Court and, thus, were guilty of contempt of court. Court case Defendant / m ask a advocate free from Qambar lawyer