Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus KHALID HUSSAIN, FOREMAN, GOVERNMENT PRINTING PRESS, MUZAFTARABAD

Civil Procedure Code Order ICPC Parties Suit OI, R10 (2) Code of Conduct of Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court, 1984, RR 37 and 42 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), Section 44 Constitutional application The addition of appropriate persons parties The option of adding a new party to the constitutional petition was available with reference to the OI, R 10 (2) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, even if a person was under OI, R 10 (2). Does not meet the given conditions. ) In the Civil Procedure Code, this person can be heard to oppose the ratification of the Constitution with the Rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rule 1984, 1984, whose sole objection was to persuade the High Court. Wish the constitutional petition was not enforceable filed by the applicant as it relates to the terms and conditions of service, although the issue of his involvement as a defendant in the constitutional petition was not disclosed, but he did The case presented that they were supportive of them. The High Court will hear from the High Court in support of their argument regarding the meaning of RR 37 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court Rules, 1984 that the constitutional petition filed by the petitioner is not safe. divorce advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer