Find a Lawyer

JAMMU AND KASHMIR COUNCIL FOR HUMAN RIGHTS versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

In sections 11 and 4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, the applicant prayed in his constitutional petition to advise the Government in the State of Jammu and Kashmir on the advice of the United Nations in Jammu and Kashmir. Instructions should be issued to the Government for advice to the Government. The reason for the UN Commission's (UNCIP) resolutions for India and Pakistan was that it was the responsibility of the governments of Pakistan and India to enforce the resolutions of the 1948 and 1949 UN Commission of India and Pakistan (UNCIP). And to achieve this, the government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the independent state of Jammu and Kashmir, is part of the Constitution, Section 11, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act, 1974 Was obliged to appoint a PlaySite Advisor for advice. The government's view for this purpose was that the appointment was a constitutional requirement, but the appointment of a consultant was premature because the voting process had not begun. This was the right moment for the appointment of a consultant when the voting process actually started and India would agree. The question of appointing an adviser was a political question that could only be pursued by the executive at its discretion and the courts should not interfere in that question and that the UN Commission of India and Pakistan in the 1948 resolution of the Government of Pakistan The Government and Council of Azad Kashmir have no obligation to legislate on this subject; they cannot issue any executive order in this regard; when you need a advocate from Digri lawyer