Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN versus MUHAMMAD LATIF

Section 42 (12) and 47 of the Interim Constitution Drafting Act 1974 of the Azad Jammu filed for challenging the post of Secretary, Services and General Administration in the writ petition in the nature of jurisdiction of the retirement service. It was said that he was included. 10 5 served in 1966 and according to the Matriculation Certificate his date of birth is 28 4 1936 and he reached the age of compensation on 28 4 1996, could not be appointed, the High Court filed the writ petition. Deleted due to unavailability of option. The dispute of justification relating to the date on which the Government employee has to retire shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Government employee and the same matter was in the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court Service Tribunal, therefore, by the applicant. The dismissal written petition, though dismissed as writ. Nonetheless, the basis on which this demand was made was to seek a declaration to cancel the government notification, against the Matriculation Certificate, the age of the public servant and the first entry in his service book, its correct date. Determining the date of birth and retirement, such claims were essentially in accordance with the terms and conditions of service, because, one of the terms and conditions of retirement was the Service High Court, therefore, Section 47, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. There was no jurisdiction under the Interim Constitution Act, 1974; the leave to appeal was denied in circumstances. best advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer