Section 13 victimization, right before the rights of the requisite, cannot be exercised unless the pre-emptor had made an interpretation after hearing about the sale at the same meeting. I was fatal to the right to be delayed. If such an inquiry has not been made in time to know about the sale of the Muq Qur'an and there is no short delay in it, then the right will be extinguished. In the present case the plaintiff succeeded in obtaining an order of premature reinforcement; it did not make an urgent demand in the same meeting on the receipt of information in connection with the sale of the suit land; both the courts had rightly decided that The pre-emptor failed to complete. The Talbot cannot prove its claim by presenting credible, strong, reliable and convincing evidence to prove the need for a pre-emptor. According to the law, both the courts below have presented the evidence presented by the parties legally and accurately. And correctly denied the claim of the plaintiff that the plaintiff did not indicate any wrong reading and non-reading The plaintiff's modification was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
