Section 5, Schedule Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for the Recovering of Articles of the Petitioner's Claims The Partial Trial Court Was Permitted Partially by the Appeal Court on the Appeal filed by the Applicant (the Wife) The appeal and the results allowed were recorded by the trial court and passed in favor of the decree (husband) for the recovery of the gold jewelry, which the dispute raised by the petitioner was determined by the fact that Did the applicant (wife) leave the defendant's house sleep with her or did the validity petitioner (s) take their leave? At cross-examination, she rejected the suggestion that she ever carried controversial gold jewelry with her parents when she went home. The dispute was not put on the gold detail / specification question. The applicant's uncle (wife) confirmed the allegations leveled by the plaintiff, they were not questioned by the disputed gold jewelry. Wore jewelery but did not witness the defendant's husband (husband) stated that the applicant (wife) had committed adultery while leaving the house. Controversial gold jewelry but he did not say whether the case was made by his son or not but in the circumstances the appellate court made a serious mistake in completely ignoring the record available while the defendant (husband) Announcing controversial gold jewelry in favor of the applicant (wife). Apparently misrepresent yourself through unwanted court decisions and decrees
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
