Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, FAISALABAD TELECOM REGION, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, FAISALABAD versus MUHAMMAD MUJAHID

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 22A (8) (G) and 22D West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 0 1 (b) as the reverse employees. The lineman performs the manual, academic and technical duties without any administrative, supervisory and administrative powers; the employees whose services were expanded were added to the seniority list and given an annual increment, Employees working as Mains were allowed, returned as jobs. Coley, whose reversal was challenged by the employees in his application filed under Section 22A (8) (G), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was filed by the employer claiming that the employee who was in charge of the work Busy on the basis, was not a permanent employee and could not challenge the overturned employee who has served as a lineman for 5 years, will be considered a permanent worker who will reverse his national and national problem. Can challenge. The Industrial Relations Commission had exclusive jurisdiction to resolve employee complaints that brought the unfair labor practice element of the employer into permanent employment, which cannot be summarily dismissed. solicitors from Kalaswala lawyer