Find a Lawyer

METALEX CORPORATION WORKERS\' UNION, C.B.A. versus METALEX CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD.

Articles 15, 22A (8) (G) and 26 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (i) to confirm the interim prohibited settlement Employers and employees who reached the center were terminated by the union for a term of three years, on the request of such dismissal filed by both parties, giving notice to the employees to lockout the job. Tho \ union employees \ union filed the challenge of the lockout operation filed by the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) of 1973, Industrial Relations Prior to the National Industrial Relations Commission on requests under the Ordinance, 1969, and Regulation 32 (2) (c), this notice was an act of unfair labor by employers, after the settlement between the parties ended. , Both sides were demanded to serve the heirs. In the event of a mutual failure, another employer may give a lockout notice to employees' union under Section 26 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, and then take the matter to regional reconciliation. In the affidavit filed by the employees / union that the employer had ever targeted any employee or union of the employees due to the activities of a trade union. The Employees Union, which failed to establish unfair practice against the employer, was not. Employees capable of submitting the first lawsuit to approve the interim injunction application The union's dismissal of the application filed under Regln 32 (2) (c) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulation and Duties) Regulations, 1973 and the interim injunction Pakistan, top advocate family court from Chaghi lawyer