Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD versus QAISER AGHA KAZMI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15, 22A (8) (g) and 22 Delegation of unauthorized absence from duty Employee Employee was removed from employment due to prolonged duty unauthorized absence, Absence of duty was self-contained No document filed by the employee is available in the record which indicates that the Review Board made recommendations to the Ministry or other authorities for the re-employment / reappointment of the job as It was claimed that the employee who was currently employed as an auditor in the Telegraph and Telephone Department. Removing from his job was a civil servant and not a workman. The National Industrial Relations Commission, in the circumstances, had no jurisdiction to entertain and decide on the matter because the employee's terms of service and conditions. Being one of them, he had a cure before. Removal of the Federal Service Tribunal from the job for an unauthorized absence from duty cannot be deemed invalid, unless the employee requests a job to be filed by the employees with the National Industrial Relations Commission. After dismissing his job for 16 years after retiring from his job: the employees suffered serious negligence were dismissed. top advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer