Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION versus NAZIR AHMAD

Rules 15, 22A (8) (G) and 22D of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 abolish the service by employing an employee-proof employee whose services after issuing a show cause notice and providing him with a hearing on duty. Was officially canceled from the post, the representative of the Chief Minister was advised to re-represent, whose representation was rejected, the employees of such ban were rejected. Remained silent for a long time and after completing his service for almost 16 years he filed an application under section 22A. 8) (g) Single Bench of Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 National Industrial Relations Commission, before such application was filed, without any record of evidence and practice of unfair labor through single bench of National Industrial Relations. Accepts pending petitions without setting up a The Commission was not justified in accepting employees' severe delays against Tier for their unauthorized absence from duty, especially when assessing the costs of the bribes, especially when applying such a request. If the employee had trouble not filing a show cause notice or allegedly false inquiry against him, he could seek remedy. At the relevant time, the forum in which the employee failed to legislate, he would support unfair labor practice by the employer in terminating the services of the employees, has not been proved, a single bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission Was granted the jurisdiction over. In this case, a job approved by a single bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Madinah lawyer