Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI ANJUM versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, NORTH ZONE, LAHORE REGION,LAHORE

Sections 8 (7) and 38 (3a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XVII, R 3 The election by rival trade unions conflicted with which of the two trade unions. Is the registrar of? That the election held by Defendants' Union on June 22, 1994 was genuine, while a second union of applicants requested the Labor Court jurisdiction over the hypothetical petition, thereby giving them evidence to support their claim. Was required to present who was elected on 29 election 9. 1994 was genuine when respondents were granted numerous opportunities for such purposes on 229 1994 by the respondents, but they also failed to examine a witness labor court eventually applying under Rule XVII, R3. Evidence of CPC closed, no evidence available on record No evidence available on record; In support of petitioner's confession before Labor Court, his request for non-submission of evidence was rightly dismissed. On the ship, an inquiry and order made by the registrar raising objections against the verification was found, and rightly so, The striker was empowered to act in this case, in the absence of power, as he ordered to block the evidence of a Labor Court-approved applicant. From any angle it is believed that the applicant was not entitled to seek any further error from the Labor Court in the preparation of the evidence; the applicant had to appear in the process of law and agreed to hold the ballot for the last time. 17 took place on 4 1994 and on 22 22 1994 the Union of Officers law firms from Mastoi lawyer