Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANSEF QURESHI versus EMPLOYER/MANAGER, JAMIA SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3A) Jurisdiction to amend the Labor Appellate Tribunal Exercise for Job Reinstatement and dismiss its solicitor's complaint for failure to appear on the postponement date of its hearing. G,. 28 days after the dismissal of the Complaint Request for Illegal Prosecution, the employee's request for reinstatement was filed on the basis that he and his lawyer had been mistaken in recording the exact date of the hearing in the Diary Labor. Cannot appear in court at the hearing date. The court rejected the request for reinstatement of the complaint, stating that the employee's reason for not appearing in court was not disclosed. The employee challenged the Labor Court's order in the affirmation. The Tribunal question was one of the facts that was dealt with by the Labor Court. And no fault was found in the Labor Court's ruling that could be termed a legal impairment. The tribunal only had to consider a request for review on the basis of legal status, accuracy or accuracy, if in the absence of a legal error, The request did not lie. online advocate from Kalaswala lawyer